Alternative Facts - The Legacy of New York Times v. Sullivan and the Limits of Defamation Law

About this program
In a time when free speech is coming under significant attack, this panel will explore the landmark Supreme Court case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan and its enduring impact on First Amendment law. Decided during the civil rights era, the ruling established the “actual malice” standard, requiring public officials to prove that defamatory statements were knowingly false or made with reckless disregard for the truth. By raising the bar for defamation claims the Court strengthened protections for investigative journalism and open debate on public issues. This discussion will examine the case’s historical context, its legal doctrine, and its continuing relevance and modern debates over press freedom, misinformation, and accountability.
This OnDemand CLE program earns 0.75 hours of General credit in California. It aired October 9, 2026.
More Entertainment Law CLEs
Synthetic Performers in Advertising: CA and NY’s New AI Disclosure Laws
Do You Own Your Games: Licensing, Access, and the End of Physical Media
AI and Copyright Update: Navigating Cross-Border Artificial Intelligence
Ken Ziffren: 2026 Trends and Transitions for Media and Entertainment Lawyers
Negotiating Indemnification Clauses in Game Development and Publishing Contracts
Sample, Create, Litigate: Inside AI Music Production and the Copyright Fights Shaping It
2026 USC-BHBA Institute on Entertainment Law and Business
Everything Everywhere All at Once – A Global Snapshot of AI Regulation for the Entertainment Industry
Named Best CLE Provider and Best Online CLE Provider by The Recorder in both 2025 and 2026. Built for lawyers, by lawyers, to keep you ahead.
Stream anywhere
Watch on your phone, tablet, or computer, whenever it fits your schedule.
Certificate in minutes
Your certificate is emailed automatically and saved in My BHBA+.
Track your credits
My BHBA+ shows your credits, deadlines, and progress in one place.