Part Two: Appellate Oral Argument from the Decisionmaker's Perspective
About this program
Oral argument does not begin when counsel steps to the lectern. It begins with the themes, credibility, and framework established in the briefing. The most effective advocates understand how oral argument complements the written presentation and helps decisionmakers resolve the questions that matter most.
Building on the principles discussed in Part One, M.C. Sungaila and Melanie Gold of Complex Appellate Litigation Group LLP examine oral argument through the lens of those evaluating the case. Participants will learn how to respond effectively to judicial concerns, reinforce key themes from the briefing, and view oral argument as a critical component of a unified persuasive strategy.
This OnDemand CLE program earns 1.25 hours of General credit in California. It aired September 9, 2026 and features Melanie Gold and Mary-Christine (M.C.) Sungaila.
More Appellate Law CLEs
Part One: Appellate Briefing from the Decisionmaker’s Perspective
Unpacking the Landmark 2026 Social Media Addiction Decisions: The Appellate Perspective
New Statement of Decision Statute and Rules: Tips To Prevent Mistakes
Preserving Error for Appellate Review
Appellate Oral Argument Strategy: How to Argue Clear Losers, Clear Winners, and
Writing to Win II: Advanced Techniques for Persuading Judges
How to Avoid Sinking Your Civil Appeal Before It Sets Sail
Before the Appeal: A California Litigator’s Pre-Appeal Checklist
Named Best CLE Provider and Best Online CLE Provider by The Recorder in both 2025 and 2026. Built for lawyers, by lawyers, to keep you ahead.
Stream anywhere
Watch on your phone, tablet, or computer, whenever it fits your schedule.
Certificate in minutes
Your certificate is emailed automatically and saved in My BHBA+.
Track your credits
My BHBA+ shows your credits, deadlines, and progress in one place.