The Narrowing Path of Federal Fraud Defenses After Kousisis and Bankman-Fried

About this program
In federal white collar prosecutions and civil RICO litigation, defendants have often sought to demonstrate their good faith intent by arguing that they did not intend to cause any loss to victims, and that there were attorneys involved in the decision-making process under scrutiny. Recent decisions by the Supreme Court in U.S. v. Kousisis and the Second Circuit in U.S. v. Bankman-Fried make those defenses much harder to raise. This presentation discusses both cases, their impact on federal cases involving fraud allegations, and how attorneys on both sides of the issues can plan their strategies accordingly.
This OnDemand CLE program earns 1 hour of General credit in California. It aired September 2, 2026.
More Criminal Law CLEs
The California Racial Justice Act in Practice: Claims, Evidence, Remedies, and A
Financial Elder Abuse Litigation in 2026: Holding Those Who Commit Elder Abuse
Recognizing and Combatting Adultification Bias: Strategies for Legal Practitioners
DUI Defense – Strategic Case Preparation for Successful Outcomes
Racial Bias in the Jury Room Post Sanchez: New Strategies for the Defense
When Seeing Isn’t Believing: Challenging Visual Evidence in Modern Prosecutions
Lessons from Villarreal v. Texas: Defendant Testimony, Witness Preparation, and
AI and White Collar Crime Enforcement Trends, AI Washing Liability, and Buildin
Named Best CLE Provider and Best Online CLE Provider by The Recorder in both 2025 and 2026. Built for lawyers, by lawyers, to keep you ahead.
Stream anywhere
Watch on your phone, tablet, or computer, whenever it fits your schedule.
Certificate in minutes
Your certificate is emailed automatically and saved in My BHBA+.
Track your credits
My BHBA+ shows your credits, deadlines, and progress in one place.