Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence: AI/Fair Use Implications Going Forward

Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence: AI/Fair Use Implications Going Forward
Join to access free
Professional members and above get unlimited live and OnDemand CLE, and Sustainer members get 25 OnDemand hours.
Non-member price $45

About this program

In a landmark decision on February 11, 2025, U.S. Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas ruled in favor of Thomson Reuters in its copyright infringement lawsuit against Ross Intelligence. The court determined that Ross's use of Thomson Reuters' Westlaw headnotes to train its AI-based legal research tool did not qualify as fair use under U.S. copyright law.

This program examines the court’s reasoning, its interpretation of fair use, and the broader implications for copyright holders and AI innovation.

This OnDemand CLE program earns 1 hour of General credit in California. It aired March 10, 2025 and features Jeremy S. Goldman.

Award-Winning. Nationally Recognized. Always Relevant.

Named Best CLE Provider and Best Online CLE Provider by The Recorder in both 2025 and 2026. Built for lawyers, by lawyers, to keep you ahead.

The Recorder Best of 2026, CLE Provider The Recorder Best of 2026, Online CLE Provider The Recorder Best of 2025, CLE Provider The Recorder Best of 2025, Online CLE Provider

Stream anywhere

Watch on your phone, tablet, or computer, whenever it fits your schedule.

Certificate in minutes

Your certificate is emailed automatically and saved in My BHBA+.

Track your credits

My BHBA+ shows your credits, deadlines, and progress in one place.